<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=2248836&amp;fmt=gif">
Radiology & Nuclear Medicine
PET Segmentation

Rohren EM, Etchebehere EC, Araujo JC, Hobbs BP, Swanston NM, Everding M, Moody T, Macapinlac HA. Determination of Skeletal Tumor Burden on 18F-Fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56:1507-1512.

Zhang G, Han D, Ma C, Lu J, Sun T, Liu T, Zhu J, Zhou J, Yin Y. Gradient-based Delineation of the Primary GTV on FLT PET in Squamous Cell Cancer of the Thoracic Esophagus and Impact on Radiotherapy Planning. Radiation Oncology 2015, 10:11.

Sridhar P, Mercier G, Tan J, Truong MT, Daly B, Subramaniam RM. FDG PET Metabolic Tumor Volume Segmentation and Pathologic Volume of Primary Human Solid Tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202(5):1114-9.

Nelson AS, Faulhaber PF, Pirozzi SD, Harper JW, Piper JW. Comparison of Gradient PET Segmentation from a Multi-Modality PET/CT Measurement Tool to Gradient PET Segmentation Alone. J Nucl Med. 2014; 55 (Supplement 1):1522.

Werner-Wasik M, Nelson D, Choi W, Arai Y, Faulhaber P, Kang P, Almeida F, Xiao Y, Ohri N, Brockway K, Piper J, Nelson A. What is the Best Way to Contour Lung Tumors on PET Scans: Multi-Observer Validation of a Gradient-Based Method Using a NSCLC Digital PET Phantom. IJROBP 2012; 82(3):1164-1171.

Fogh S, Karancke J, Nelson AS, McCue P, Axelrod R, Werner-Wasik W. Pathologic Correlation of PET-CT Based Auto-Contouring for Radiation Planning in Lung Cancer. Presented at the World Conference on Lung Cancer Meeting in 2009.

Werner-Wasik M, Kang P, Choi W, Ohri N, Faulhaber P, Nelson D, Nelson A, Piper J, Shen Z, Pirozzi S. Comparison of PET Contouring Methods in Patients With Early-Stage Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Pathologic–Imaging Correlation IJROBP 2013; 87(2):S540.

Nelson AS, Werner-Wasik M, Choi W, et al. Evaluation of Gradient PET Segmentation for Total Lesion Glycolysis Compared to Thresholds and Manual Contouring. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52 (Supplement 1):2077.

Nelson AD, Nelson AS. Tissue Segmentation in PET Image Volumes. June 2018.

PET Treatment Response

Etchebehere EC, Araujo JC, Fox PS, Swanston NM, Macapinlac HA, Rohren EM. Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Skeletal Tumor Burden on Baseline 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in Predicting Overall Survival. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56:1177-1184.

Yu J, Cooley T, Truong MT, Mercier G, Subramaniam RM. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers (Stages III and IV) Induction Chemotherapy Assessment: Value of FDG Volumetric Imaging Parameters. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2014; 58(1):18-24.

Davison J, Mercier G, Russo G, Subramaniam RM. PET-Based Primary Tumor Volumetric Parameters and Survival of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200(3):635-40.

Shah B, Srivastava N, Hirsch AE, et al. Intra-Reader Reliability of FDG PET Volumetric Tumor Parameters: Effects of Primary Tumor Size and Segmentation Methods. Ann Nucl Med. 2012 Nov;26(9):707-14.

Liao S, Penney BC, Wroblewski K, et al. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Burden on 18FFDG PET in Nonsurgical Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39(1):27-38.

Nelson AD, Nelson AS. MIM® for Therapy Response Evaluation. June 2018.